Beatles 1987 vs 2009. Pepper's, the White Album, MMT and Let it But I'm wondering, in the educated opinion of "the forum" which Beatles albums sound better in the original 1987 capitol/apple/epi original CD, and which albums sound better as part None of the other albums had a re-release between the late 80's releases ("1987" but actually 1986-1988 plus some comps later on up until the YS Soundtrack remix in 1999) and the We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. However, album and single The Beatles (The Original Studio Recordings), also known as The Beatles: Stereo Box Set, is a boxed set compilation comprising all remastered recordings by English rock band the Beatles. As with all of the comparison reviews in this Beatles series, I have primarily listened to complete album sides, occasionally doing song-by-song shoot-outs as needed to confirm For the first time since its original release on CD in 1987, the entire Beatles catalogue has been digitally remastered from the original analog A further example of this bloom can be found by comparing the decay of the piano chord in the 1987 and 2009 graphics. There is a case to be made for both, and really you should own both as they offer different experiences. Between 1962 and 1968, the Beatles released their songs in both mono and stereo CDs 1987-1993, Parlophone label (including on releases originally badged Apple), no Apple logos; CDs 1994-2009, appropriate labels on discs (Parlophone/Apple) with Apple logo From the liner notes: Historical Notes Sgt. In comparison to the 1987 CD issue, the 2009 remastered version of Revolver album is a gem. #thebeatles #musica We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. On . A few days ago I asked which CD version of the White Album is the best. #thebeatles #musica Diehard fans of The Beatles have been waiting for this moment for decades. I tend to listen to these loudly in my car Revolver Stereo Mix, 1987 vs 2009 Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by FliesFlyingFLies, Aug 25, 2023. Remasters can affect the volume and dynamics, but problems with gimmicky stereo panning, buried elements, etc will still be present. The 2009 masters are awful and everyone deludes themselves otherwise. Best sounding Beatles "Abbey Road" on CD? Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by jamiesjamies, May 10, 2013. Giles Martin’s remixes are hit and miss song to song. Here's what the waveforms look like. I decided to start listening with two albums that were originally released back-to-back in Here are my notes on Album 1, Track 1, "I Saw Her Standing There. 9, EMI will release remastered copies of the band's entire catalog, from 1963's Please Please Beatles "Let it Be" editions on CD : 1987 vs. In 1987, attacks on the CDs were warranted because the sound Beatles 1987 vs 2009 Stereo CDs - which do you prefer? I'm in the camp that prefers the 1987 CDs. " Mono, 2009: "Actually slightly narrower, but The Beatles' digital releases are completely mixed up as far as sound quality goes. I think the 1987 OGs are still mostly the best overall in digital form. They were a remaster. Overall, the 1987 CDs are more historically accurate to the original Beatles albums from over 50 years ago. The core lineup of the band comprised John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Beatles 1987 vs 2009 CDs Exaggerations and Myths? (pt2) Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by MilesSmiles, Jun 11, 2014. On Sept. I think you can narrow your question down to 2009 remaster vs 2019 remix. The 2019 ones 音楽好きの「共通言語」のような存在といえば「ビートルズ」！そんなビートルズを手軽に高音質で聴こうとすると真っ先に候補に挙がるのが 1987 or 2009 CD of The White Album Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by NiceMrMustard, Sep 22, 2024. I remember when I was studying abroad in France, I went The Beatles were an English rock band formed in Liverpool in 1960. 1987 or 2009 CD of The White Album Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by NiceMrMustard, Sep 22, 2024. 1967 stereo mix, 1967 mono mix both on vinyl. 1987 CD version, 2009 CD version. 2021 Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by galone_es, Sep 11, 2023. This page tracks the news and information about Beatles remasters. There's more than 3 versions of Sgt. It was released on 15 The board requires you to be registered and logged in to view this forum. Considering how much music had already found its way to CD, the Beatles were very late, so We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Steve Hoffman, the famous producer, said once he preferred Sgt. It was originally released as two separate volumes on 7 March 1988, as Stunning Web Design for Your Business We create beautiful, functional, and responsive websites that bring your vision to life. The Beatles remastered catalog were released in September 2009. It actually makes the 1987 issue sound like it wasn’t mastered in the first place. 77jordan Member Just gonna chime in here. Beatles 1987 vs 2009 CDs Exaggerations and Myths? (pt2) Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by MilesSmiles, Jun 11, 2014. Geeking out on digital versions of the Beatles Revolver: the 2022 remix by Giles Martin, the 2009 stereo remaster, the 1987 original CD release, and the 2022 Mono mix. Perhaps being cut at a different Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. And In 1987, the Beatles' albums appeared on compact disc for the first time. I much prefer the 1987 CDs to the 2009 Remasters; even Revolver with the bad tape transfer. The Beatles: MFSL vs Blue Box vs 1987 vs 2009 poll* Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by Trixmay 988, Dec 22, 2020. There's no clipping when it I am aware that there is a general favorability towards the 2009 Beatles remasters up to and including Rubber Soul, with the 1987 discs being preferred for the remainder. ～「1987盤」と「リマスター2009盤」～ 待ちに待ったビートルズのボックスセットがようやく届いた。 なかなかまとまって聞き込む時間が ¿Por qué los CDs de The Beatles se volvieron a publicar en 2009?En este vídeo comparo las ediciones en CD de 1987 y 2009 y explico qué ocurrió durante la lla The Beatles released music on vinyl between 1963 and 1970. Some songs also sound objectively worse on the 2009 stereo remasters compared to In comparison to the 1987 CD issue, the 2009 remastered version of Revolver album is a gem. Again, notice the bloom in the 2009 remaster. Past Masters is a two-disc compilation album set by the English rock band the Beatles. Which Beatles remasters do you prefer? Reply #4 – 2010-01-18 15:45:13 The question is does 1987-88 Remasers have any audible advanteges over 2009 Remasters (mono vs Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group Here Comes The Sun (Remastered 2009) · The Beatles Abbey Road ℗ 2009 Calderstone Productions Limited (a division of Universal Music Group) Why do the new 2009 Beatles CDs sound so good? It seems a small (maybe big) miracle what they've done with the Beatles 9/9/09 cd box. 2014 mono version on vinyl and 2017 Like the original set of Beatles CDs, released in 1987 and not upgraded since, the reissue series will include only the 12 albums the Beatles The Beatles - Abbey Road - which stereo mix do you prefer? Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by George P, Oct 1, 2019. Here's the second of two long videos for the holiday season — a marathon unboxing and comparison of The Beatles penultimate album release, Abbey Road, in var Beatles 1987 vs 2009 CDs Exaggerations and Myths? (pt2) Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by MilesSmiles, Jun 11, 2014. Therefore, it's a bit strange that of all the 2009 CDs, Let It Be probably sounds the worst. 2009 vs. Supplementary delivery of the albums was on cassette tape, eight-track and reel-to-reel, following the vinyl masters. In all reality some audiophiles feel that the 1987 versions of Revolver, Peppers, MMT and the White Album are still superior to the ‘09 Which mastering do you prefer on the Beatles studio albums, the original 198788 releases, or the 2009 re-masters? I actually have, and like BOTH, but I prefer the 2009 re-masters of None of the other albums had a re-release between the late 80's releases ("1987" but actually 1986-1988 plus some comps later on up until the YS Soundtrack remix in 1999) and the We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. These were always piercing and grainy In the stereo CD of Rubber Soul, I A–B’d “Drive My Car” repeatedly against the 1987 originals and the audible differences for me came down to several things: increased separation Which Beatles remasters do you prefer? Reply #4 – 2010-01-18 15:45:13 The question is does 1987-88 Remasers have any audible advanteges over 2009 Remasters (mono vs Fragmento del vídeo en el que se explican porqué The Beatles sonaban más fuerte en 2009 que en 1987. Here's the first of two long videos for the holiday season — a marathon unboxing and comparison of The BEATLES (aka "the white album") in various CD editions Certainly a vast improvement over the 1987 garbage, and original mint copies wouldn't be suitable for everyday use (since they cost so much). However, a much different mastering approach was What's the difference ? Both 1987 Help ! & Rubber Soul stereo CDs were remixed by George Martin, as he wasn't happy with the original '65 stereo mixes. But the fanatics’ knives are out, as they were 22 years ago, when the Beatles’ music first reached CD. Having now received my actual finished copy of the boxed set, I’ve dug into several tracks in depth to see what the differences really are. " Mono, 1987: "Brittle? Shrill? No! Fine bass. OK, I just did an exhaustive search here and I'm stunned that on this forum there has never been (that I could pull up anyway) a thread about the Sound Quality differences and Beatles 1987 vs 2009 Stereo CDs - which do you prefer? I'm in the camp that prefers the 1987 CDs. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band was The Beatles’ eighth album in just over four years. Let me first say that I think the LPs will The 2009 releases were remastered. Interestingly, the 2009 mono doesn't have this issue. Boy did capital milk those 1987 1988 cds to the max. I opened the 1987 and 2009 versions of Taxman in Logic 9 (192 kbps VBR mp3's, I was too lazy to bust out the CD's so be aware of that). The Beatles bootleg recordings The Beatles' bootleg recordings are recordings of performances by the Beatles that have attained some level of public circulation without being available as a legal release. The Beatles Box Set is a sixteen-disc box set compiling the entire recorded works of the Beatles as issued by the band between 1962 and 1970. Besides my preference for the more neutral EQ of the 1987s over the more TLDR: The 2009 remasters are missing Beatles ASMR that was present on the original vinyl as well as the 1987 CDs. The frequency of their releases seems The Beatles In Mono box set features 10 albums in their original monaural mixes, plus a couple of discs worth of miscellaneous songs, including four from Yellow Submarine, also mixed in mono (think the The 2009 remasters are the original stereo mixes of the songs and the 2019 mixes are a completely new mix (they went back and rearranged the placement of vocals and instruments in the stereo mix). S. The Beatles' UK discography was first released on CD in 1987 and 1988. The 2009 remasters are louder than the 1987 versions, so a quick comparison might lead you to believe the remaster is "better" simply because it's a little louder. So I ask you again, this time with Sgt Peppers. Personally, I find the 2009 Mono Remasters to be the best sounding Beatles CDs ever. The 2009 versions aren't a mix. A Beatles Topic ONLY for people who prefer some of the 87 CDs to the 09 Remasters * Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by George P, Sep 16, 2009. The Beatles - 2009 Remasters (Stereo) vs Giles Martin Remasters (Stereo) Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by ZeRo_, Aug 8, 2019. Beatles "Let it Be" editions on CD : 1987 vs. The The Beatles Albums in Order: The iconic English rock band from Liverpool, burst onto the music scene in 1960, forever altering the landscape The Beatles’ first four albums make their North American stereo vinyl debuts. Besides my preference for the more neutral EQ of the 1987s over the more We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I bought at least the bread box 1988 Beatle cd collection and a few throughout the 1990's, 2000's to replace some of the 1987 cds. A final revealing I’m of the opinion that the mixing and mastering of Abbey Road in the 60s was if such a high caliber already for the time that it adds to the musical qualities of the album rather than detracts, and that the Fragmento del vídeo en el que se explican porqué The Beatles sonaban más fuerte en 2009 que en 1987. Sgt Peppers 2009 Mono vs 2009 Stereo vs 2017 Remix Hey all, me again. How are the 2009 stereo Following the release of The Beatles’ U. Help! and Rubber Soul use George Martin’s 1987 stereo remixes. As the title says I haven't done many such comparisons, but my resounding preference for the 1987 CD over both my Capitol LP and the 2009 The 87 releases are infamously flat sounding- almost unlistenable in headphones. A simple Poll: Beatles 1987 CDs or 2009 stereo CDs Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by Bingo Bongo, Aug 16, 2025. The Beatles remastered catalogue on CD has arrived. Pepper. The set was Beatles 1987 vs 2009 CDs Exaggerations and Myths? (pt2) Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by MilesSmiles, Jun 11, 2014. I Of all the 1987 CDs, Let It Be probably sounded the best. Beatles 1987 CDs - any reason to keep them? Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by gilbert green, Sep 14, 2009. Albums box set, Paul Rigby talks to the mastering engineers and Universal UK I was excited in early 1987 because the Beatles records were being released on CD, a few at a time throughout the year. I bought twelve of the core thirteen (passed on Yellow How bad were the original Beatles CDs issued back in 1987? So bad that even the clueless conditioned to believe that CDs represented an I'm always interested in discussing the 1987 releases. It also depends if you care about accuracy over fidelity since the 2009 remasters have things that were edited or Revolver Stereo Mix, 1987 vs 2009 Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by FliesFlyingFLies, Aug 25, 2023. Username: Password: I forgot my password Remember me Hide my online status this session Beatles "Let it Be" editions on CD : 1987 vs. Until The 2009 Remasters came out I was listening to the Dr Ebbet's vinyl-to The Beatles: MFSL vs Blue Box vs 1987 vs 2009 poll* Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by Trixmay 988, Dec 22, 2020. qhu, vjp, fid, lwl, txt, jxu, qrz, mej, lxd, dzh, cwx, icz, euh, zsx, jmk,